Been told that Peter Ingram should have a slight off-side preference rather than leg side preference
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
11.08 Database Errors Thread
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Wheater is way too good as well. Is it not time to change how you give people rankings? At least for the English and Australian teams where I'm sure people will be willing to rank them for you, just seems a bit odd to use such an agricultural way of getting peoples ranking of basically using their average to give them a ranking. That's how it looks like its done from the outside looking in.
Is it not possible to nerf Sri Lankan/West Indian spinners rankings by using some sort of mulitiplier when you rank them? So if they average 20 in domestic stuffe they'd be ranked as good as a test bowler who average 28-32. Based on presumption that you're simply feeding peoples averages into some sort of formula couldn't you just times their bowling averages by 1.4 or some like. Likewise for India batsmen whom bat mostly on flat pitches revise it down by 0.8 or some like.
I also think for next game player's need format specific ability and roles. I'd say it's probably a must to be honest.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Themer View PostWheater is way too good as well. Is it not time to change how you give people rankings? At least for the English and Australian teams where I'm sure people will be willing to rank them for you, just seems a bit odd to use such an agricultural way of getting peoples ranking of basically using their average to give them a ranking. That's how it looks like its done from the outside looking in.
Originally posted by Themer View PostIs it not possible to nerf Sri Lankan/West Indian spinners rankings by using some sort of mulitiplier when you rank them? So if they average 20 in domestic stuffe they'd be ranked as good as a test bowler who average 28-32. Based on presumption that you're simply feeding peoples averages into some sort of formula couldn't you just times their bowling averages by 1.4 or some like. Likewise for India batsmen whom bat mostly on flat pitches revise it down by 0.8 or some like.
Originally posted by Themer View PostI also think for next game player's need format specific ability and roles. I'd say it's probably a must to be honest.
Comment
-
I really consider Chris Nash (Sussex) as an all rounder
Has bowled in all 3 comps this year
As well as being Sussex's best bowler in T20 8 @ 12.75 !!
When he first joined Sussex he was an out and out bowler, so definately has the ability there
Overs only really get reduced due to the large amount of spinners in the team (Panaser, Yardy, Rayner, Beer)
Comment
-
Lets add him to the list of opener-all rounders then:
Shane Watson - Aus
Tillakaratne Dilshan - SL
Sanath Jayasuriya - SL
Chris Gayle - WI
Virender Sehwag - Ind
Mohammad Hafeez - Pak
Tom Smith - Eng
Rory Hamilton-Brown - Eng
Arul Suppiah - Eng
Chris Nash - Eng
Have I forgotten anyone?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chasjs View PostLets add him to the list of opener-all rounders then:
Shane Watson - Aus
Tillakaratne Dilshan - SL
Sanath Jayasuriya - SL
Chris Gayle - WI
Virender Sehwag - Ind
Mohammad Hafeez - Pak
Tom Smith - Eng
Rory Hamilton-Brown - Eng
Arul Suppiah - Eng
Chris Nash - Eng
Have I forgotten anyone?
Comment
-
Comment