Originally posted by ruby23
View Post
0: Totally random potential.
-1: Random, but likely to be a very good player.
-2: Random, but likely to be a superstar.
This would basically fulfil exactly the same role as regens, but would maybe feel a bit more relevant. The main drawback I can think of is that these junior players would need somewhere to go (like a youth squad), which might just add a layer of complexity that could detract from one of the game's main strengths - its strong focus on playing cricket matches (and not micromanaging all the minor details).
Comment