Originally posted by Xeno
View Post
I was thinking about making one but the thing is, if you change ratings of some players & not everyone in the game then that could lead to some statistical imbalances & inaccuracies as I've said before, like your own batsmen/bowlers performing too well which then becomes unrealistic; for the same reason, I remember debating Chewie a while back as to why, under the circumstances (with spinners overperforming,etc), Vettori should NOT get his deserved rating of ~650, under an updated roster.
So as far as I'm concerned (although others may think otherwise), either all players in the game should be edited/adjusted or I'd rather not bother with it, otherwise we're back at square one ie some players overperforming (be it your own) & some underperforming; & the thing is even editing everyone mayn't get you the best results because playing conditions aren't realistic enough. May be I'm way too persnickety about this but being a stats-maniac I can't help it.
For me, the only way to fix this issue is getting the playing conditions to resemble real-life as closely as possible. If you observe closely, all the players' real-life-statistics are massively affected by playing conditions, so if the playing conditions are gotten right (of course, there'll've to some leeway)then all players can be given a rating close to what they deserve & yet their stats will be real-life-like. Right now, as I've said in the other thread I've started, playing conditions are neither sufficient nor are they having the proper impact on the game & this short-coming then has to be compensated for by underrating/overrating players; for example, since spinners are overperforming in the game, Vettori must be given a poor rating or else he'll average 25-something if given he's given the rating he deserves (similar thing with Malinga's rating of ~800), the situation is exactly the opposite for example for Mark Gillespie, Tuffey, etc
Us editing a few players isn't going to make the game-play drastically better, the root of this issue is in the playing conditions, if they're gotten right then most things will automatically fall into place.
Originally posted by ab5ides1
View Post
If you've read any posts here about, a few seasons down the line, all the best batsmen averaging in the 30s & bowlers averating in low 20s or all the best batsmen averaging in the 50s & bowlers close to 30 then that's another instance of imbalaced ratings, only in this case, imbalaced ratings of the regen-players.
Comment