Is it me or do most 20 / 20 scores appear to be unrealistically low
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
20 / 20 Scores
Collapse
X
-
I have found this - the highest score i got was 195 for 5, and that was replied with 75 all out.
I think that there needs to be an enhanced attacking option in the 2020 matches, because players like Gibbs and McCullum, who are known for their heavy hitting and unbelivable scores, are getting ducks, or are hitting low scores, and I am yet to see anyone make a century in the 20/20.
Not that I don't appreciate the hard work the creators and editors do, but maybe to look at how to do the Twenty20's properly.
-
similar issue
i just can't seem ti find rythm in 20/20 games.
Infact now so upset with it I don't even consider it worth winning, so skip them all as useless unrequred stuff!
but deep down, it still hurts to see my team lose and more importantly crappy stupidly low batting averages and forms for my top/well groomed players
Comment
-
I've figured out the problem, well the problem with the low scores on my ICC '08...3 words
NOT ENOUGH SIXES!!
If you have a look at the number of sixes hit, it really won't be very high, and as we know from McCullem/Napier, you CAN hit A LOT of sixes in a T20.
Could this be something addressed in a patch?? If so I think it should be pretty high on the table of things in the next patch.
Comment
-
-
has anybody looked at the average score made by county teams in 20/20??? i would say it was around 150 for teams batting 1st as a guess tho i cud be wrong. so the game is a little bit below where it should be. i have to totally agree with the fact there is not enough 6s.
Comment
Comment