Round 5 Results
Final Standings
Tournament Stat Leaders
D Bradman has the most boundaries (97).
J Root and A Gilchrist have the most 6s (7)
D Underwood has the most maidens (59).
Finals Fixtures
How do the finalists stack up?
1930s
Bradman's team has really been carried by a few players. Of course, Bradman, the leading batsman of the tournament, played a pivotal role in getting the 1930s to the finals. He's been supported well by the likes of Hendren and O'Reilly but will need to see the rest of the team lift their game if they are going to progress. Overall the 1930s were lucky to get make it to the finals, just edging out the 1950s by just 0.01 RPW.
1940s
The only other 'non-modern' team to make it to the finals has really had to rely on their batsmen to scrape through to the finals. They went through the group stage winless and have had no bowlers step up to lead the attack. Morris and Nourse have ensured that their team, while winless, also remained undefeated. Considering the 1940s played most of their cricket in the years after WWII, they have certainly done well to make it into the finals.
1970s
The players that revolutionised international cricket with ODIs topped their group and were arguably the strongest performers of the tournament. In a tournament dominated by batsmen, Lillee and the 1970s bowlers have thrust their team to be one of the favourites to win the whole thing.
1980s
The 1980s are the second team to head straight to the semis. Their deep batting line-up and devastating bowlers proved they were the best in their group. While some of their biggest names have yet to perform, the likes of Viv Richards and Botham are known to put in their best when the pressure is on.
1990s
On paper, the 1990s were one of the favourites at the start of the tournament. Some of the biggest names in the history of the game are represented in this team, such as Warne, Ambrose, Tendulkar and Lara. Despite not earning the top spot in their group, the 1990s are still considered one of the top contenders.
2000s
Murali, McGrath, Kallis, Dravid, Gilchrist, Sangakkara. The 2000s boast a squad made of many names that would be thrown around for the greatest cricketers of all time. It's clear that the 2000s have one of the best bowling attacks in the tournament and have phenomenal batsmen to back them up. They narrowly missed out on a semi-final spot due to bowling against the brick wall of the 1940s in the last round and will be keen to prove that they should be the best era.
Round 5 |
40s drew with 00s |
60s drew with 80s |
50s drew with 10s |
70s defeated 90s |
Final Standings
Group A | Played | Wins | Draw | RPW | Total |
1980s | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1.05 | 6 |
2000s | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1.24 | 5 |
1940s | 4 | 3 | 1.07 | 3 | |
1960s | 4 | 3 | 0.98 | 3 | |
1920s | 4 | 3 | 0.67 | 3 | |
Group B | Played | Wins | Draw | RPW | Total |
1970s | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1.29 | 7 |
1990s | 4 | 2 | 0.85 | 4 | |
1930s | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1.03 | 3 |
1950s | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1.02 | 3 |
2010s | 4 | 3 | 0.79 | 3 |
Tournament Stat Leaders
Batsman | Runs | Bowler | Wickets |
D Bradman | 717 | B O'Reilly | 32 |
B Simpson | 613 | M Muralitharan | 32 |
C Macartney | 541 | D Lillee | 29 |
J Hobbs | 540 | S Warne | 27 |
J Root | 515 | I Qasim | 24 |
J Root and A Gilchrist have the most 6s (7)
D Underwood has the most maidens (59).
Finals Fixtures
Qualifying | Semis | Final |
90s vs 40s | 80s vs Q1 | S1 vs S2 |
00s vs 30s | 70s vs Q2 |
How do the finalists stack up?
1930s
Bradman's team has really been carried by a few players. Of course, Bradman, the leading batsman of the tournament, played a pivotal role in getting the 1930s to the finals. He's been supported well by the likes of Hendren and O'Reilly but will need to see the rest of the team lift their game if they are going to progress. Overall the 1930s were lucky to get make it to the finals, just edging out the 1950s by just 0.01 RPW.
1940s
The only other 'non-modern' team to make it to the finals has really had to rely on their batsmen to scrape through to the finals. They went through the group stage winless and have had no bowlers step up to lead the attack. Morris and Nourse have ensured that their team, while winless, also remained undefeated. Considering the 1940s played most of their cricket in the years after WWII, they have certainly done well to make it into the finals.
1970s
The players that revolutionised international cricket with ODIs topped their group and were arguably the strongest performers of the tournament. In a tournament dominated by batsmen, Lillee and the 1970s bowlers have thrust their team to be one of the favourites to win the whole thing.
1980s
The 1980s are the second team to head straight to the semis. Their deep batting line-up and devastating bowlers proved they were the best in their group. While some of their biggest names have yet to perform, the likes of Viv Richards and Botham are known to put in their best when the pressure is on.
1990s
On paper, the 1990s were one of the favourites at the start of the tournament. Some of the biggest names in the history of the game are represented in this team, such as Warne, Ambrose, Tendulkar and Lara. Despite not earning the top spot in their group, the 1990s are still considered one of the top contenders.
2000s
Murali, McGrath, Kallis, Dravid, Gilchrist, Sangakkara. The 2000s boast a squad made of many names that would be thrown around for the greatest cricketers of all time. It's clear that the 2000s have one of the best bowling attacks in the tournament and have phenomenal batsmen to back them up. They narrowly missed out on a semi-final spot due to bowling against the brick wall of the 1940s in the last round and will be keen to prove that they should be the best era.
Comment