Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bug reports

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 6ry4nj
    replied
    Originally posted by bryce87 View Post
    Yeah I have noticed this too when you skip/sim the 'keepers ability is not taken into account.
    Yes but it's the using Porterfield and the 40 byes that is unrealistic, isn't it? Certainly in Australian domestic, a team would always have a specialist keeper available to select, no matter how many were away or injured.

    Leave a comment:


  • bryce87
    replied
    Originally posted by Yorks View Post
    So currently on my game, Warwickshire are using Porterfield (a non-keeper) as their wicketkeeper as the 2 keepers in their squad are currently away at the IPL. In the FC game against me, there were about 40 byes conceded in each innings, but I was looking through the scorecards of the other games where he was keeper and he hasn't even conceded a single bye in any of them, which doesn't seem right..
    Yeah I have noticed this too when you skip/sim the 'keepers ability is not taken into account.

    Leave a comment:


  • Yorks
    replied
    So currently on my game, Warwickshire are using Porterfield (a non-keeper) as their wicketkeeper as the 2 keepers in their squad are currently away at the IPL. In the FC game against me, there were about 40 byes conceded in each innings, but I was looking through the scorecards of the other games where he was keeper and he hasn't even conceded a single bye in any of them, which doesn't seem right..

    Leave a comment:


  • Ausathon
    replied
    Not sure if this is a bug or not but in all my international saves that i've played Australia seems to become the worst cricketing nation in the world and England continues to dominate year through year.

    Also the Australian domestic comps transfer system is incredibly poor. I feel that discarded cricketers from other states should be available to sign up or coax, rather than just having random players move states. I think that it should be like how you can offer county cricketers that have been axed contracts for your county except with the Australian states.

    Leave a comment:


  • Blade007
    replied
    Originally posted by bryce87 View Post
    This ball appears to go for six - and the umpire rightfully signals it as six.
    But when we get to the match screen the batsman has been somehow deemed out?
    Had the same issue in this and the previous version.

    Leave a comment:


  • bryce87
    replied
    This ball appears to go for six - and the umpire rightfully signals it as six.
    But when we get to the match screen the batsman has been somehow deemed out?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Dylza94
    replied
    There seems to be a problem deleting games on the Mac version. I have the game selected and press delete but nothing happens. I have just been deleting the games through the game files though, so it's not too much of a big deal.

    Leave a comment:


  • bryce87
    replied
    Small one from a simmed Test match which I did not play and merely just viewed the results.

    Opener from one team retired hurt in first innings(details on profile say fracture out for seven days) and still bats in second innings.

    Leave a comment:


  • 6ry4nj
    replied
    It is the off-season in England. If I go into fixtures and try to bring up the details of a match from the past season, the program crashes. It doesn't happen all the time, only most of the time. Sometimes you can get into the match, but it crashes if you try to access the other innings. It also affects international games prior to the season end.

    As you may know, I'm playing ICC09. It's a domestic-and-England save. To be exact, I have just accepted the England job post-season, having been domestic-only most of the time up to then. (If it's relevant, I think I started the save as domestic-and-England, but gave up the England job earlier in the season)

    As I have not seen this bug reported before (iirc), either by players or developers, it could still be there.

    Leave a comment:


  • ab5ides1
    replied
    Originally posted by bnd3 View Post
    But you could say exactly the same about runs. A 50 in a low scoring game on a terrible pitch may be more valuable than a 100 in a high scoring draw. Everything to do with form is subjective in the end. I have no doubt that economy wouldn't be too hard a factor to include for form ratings.
    Yes, that's a very valid point. I think some work still needs to be done there too. Hopefully it'll eventually get to that point both in terms of runs, wickets and economy. A form algorithm that dynamic would be fantastic, but I think it's a few years away yet (unless the developers surprise me, which I would love).

    Leave a comment:


  • bnd3
    replied
    Originally posted by ab5ides1 View Post
    I agree with this, but I think it would be harder to implement than you may think. Economy is relative to the conditions. If a bowler goes at 4 an over where the others all went at 6 then that's very good, but if they go for 4 and the others go for 3 then it's not particularly great. So there'd have to be some kind of way for the game to detect the economy relative to other bowlers.
    But you could say exactly the same about runs. A 50 in a low scoring game on a terrible pitch may be more valuable than a 100 in a high scoring draw. Everything to do with form is subjective in the end. I have no doubt that economy wouldn't be too hard a factor to include for form ratings.
    Last edited by bnd3; 02-19-2012, 01:15 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • ab5ides1
    replied
    Originally posted by bnd3 View Post
    Also economy has no impact on form and it should. If a bowler bowls as spell 4-1-13-0 in a T20 match this is obviously a good spell, but his form will go down because he didn't take any wickets instead of going up.
    I agree with this, but I think it would be harder to implement than you may think. Economy is relative to the conditions. If a bowler goes at 4 an over where the others all went at 6 then that's very good, but if they go for 4 and the others go for 3 then it's not particularly great. So there'd have to be some kind of way for the game to detect the economy relative to other bowlers.

    Leave a comment:


  • bnd3
    replied
    Originally posted by bryce87 View Post
    This probably has been mentioned but I suppose it would not hurt to reiterate it.

    Batsman hit a couple of successive scores and they have 5 star form, fair enough.

    One of my bowlers takes 5/11 and then 5/21 in successive T20 matches and does not even have 3 stars of form?

    Do I need to add in that he also shows 99% coaching effect after having been on standard bowling coaching training for a long time?
    Also economy has no impact on form and it should. If a bowler bowls as spell 4-1-13-0 in a T20 match this is obviously a good spell, but his form will go down because he didn't take any wickets instead of going up.

    Leave a comment:


  • bryce87
    replied
    This probably has been mentioned but I suppose it would not hurt to reiterate it.

    Batsman hit a couple of successive scores and they have 5 star form, fair enough.

    One of my bowlers takes 5/11 and then 5/21 in successive T20 matches and does not even have 3 stars of form?

    Do I need to add in that he also shows 99% coaching effect after having been on standard bowling coaching training for a long time?

    Leave a comment:


  • bryce87
    replied
    Often you can give players physio, then save and exit, then open coach and physio and often one of your players has regained fitness without a single day passing. Pretty handy though, especially during the T20 competition, lol.

    EDIT: Upon reflection it actually seems as if it takes the proceeding days physio prematurely?
    Last edited by bryce87; 02-16-2012, 09:22 PM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X