They're in the TM2 folder as the file ICOPLTYP1.tm2
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Version 10.18/10.19 Database errors thread
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Originally posted by Chewie View PostThey're in the TM2 folder as the file ICOPLTYP1.tm2
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chewie View PostYea that's what I meant - there's an icon but no one is using it and you don't get regens using it either.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sureshot View PostThe icon in itself means not a lot, as in, just because the icon exists, doesn't mean the code for the position does, it's not a case of opener all-rounders existing in the game and us not assigning it to the relevant players. The Opener all-rounder problem, as mentioned elsewhere, is something we are aware of.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sureshot View PostThe icon in itself means not a lot, as in, just because the icon exists, doesn't mean the code for the position does, it's not a case of opener all-rounders existing in the game and us not assigning it to the relevant players. The Opener all-rounder problem, as mentioned elsewhere, is something we are aware of.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 6ry4nj View PostPersonally, all I want is the icon - no code required! It doesn't have to make the guy (I think the example was Watson) play any different to what he does already. It just has to acknowledge what he is.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 6ry4nj View PostPersonally, all I want is the icon - no code required! It doesn't have to make the guy (I think the example was Watson) play any different to what he does already. It just has to acknowledge what he is.
That'd be fairly pointless, giving Watson the Opener All-Rounder icon with no code behind it then he's still going to be playing at 6/7. If we were to do that, it'd look awful, as such, it won't happen. As said before, we're aware of the opener all-rounder issue.
Phylos - Yes, the opening batsman status (along with the others) does mean something to the game, it's more than a symbolic picture.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sureshot View PostThat'd be fairly pointless, giving Watson the Opener All-Rounder icon with no code behind it then he's still going to be playing at 6/7. If we were to do that, it'd look awful, as such, it won't happen. As said before, we're aware of the opener all-rounder issue.
Phylos - Yes, the opening batsman status (along with the others) does mean something to the game, it's more than a symbolic picture.
Comment
-
Lancashire
Proctor - Seen him bowl several times live over the past year and thought he looked quick but wasn't sure if it was just an illusion because of his odd action. Watched highlights of last weeks game though and he was in the 80s all the time. Faster than RM I think.
Overseas player - Maharoof.
Not sure whether Kahn is Reserve/T20. He was signed for T20s but could play Championship cricket if Maharoof is called up again to the national side/A side. That is providing he gets a visa.
EDIT: And personal opinion. Saj Mahmood's batting needs to be improved a tad and changed to very aggressive. He's batted at 5 for Lancs in his last two T20 innings and last season played some great counter attacking innings' down the order in the championship. He now seems to be batting ahead of Chapple and Hogg and in ICC2010 he isn't in the same league as them with the bat.Last edited by Chasjs; 06-22-2011, 12:20 AM.
Comment
-
Just for ICC 2011 you may like to note that Tom Cooper (South Australia and Netherlands) is a part time keeper.
Evidence: http://www.espncricinfo.com/icc-inte...ch/492267.html
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sureshot View PostThat'd be fairly pointless, giving Watson the Opener All-Rounder icon with no code behind it then he's still going to be playing at 6/7. If we were to do that, it'd look awful, as such, it won't happen. As said before, we're aware of the opener all-rounder issue.
Phylos - Yes, the opening batsman status (along with the others) does mean something to the game, it's more than a symbolic picture.
Comment
Comment