Then I got to Twenty20 and started taking more notice into the AI matches. I ran a quick spreadsheet, and as at 18th June there have been 27 1st innings that got at least into the final over - the average 1st innings total was 121.04.
I've run the same calculation from this year's real life Twenty20 - the first 27 scorecards of 1st inninngs that get at least into the final over show an average total of 159.37.
IRL there were 17 innings of 27 that were 150+. In my game, there were three out of 27 of less than 100, and only one of over 150 (strangely a massive jump to 178
). That's only one innings in 27 that is within 10 runs of the RL average total.IRL, there were 2 of the first 27 cards showing a total of less than 120. There were 9 innings (always of 27) in my game lower than the RL lowest total.
IRL there seven cards out of the 27 higher than the highest ICC2008 total from these 27 cards.
This is not a massive sample size, but is enough to show that there is a problem in Twenty20 totals, and it appears to be about 30% out.




Leave a comment: