Originally posted by bryce87
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Cricket Captain 2018 Database Feedback
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
-
jjamez It should be SLU (Slow let-arm unorthodox). This sounds great rather than SLC or LLS
Leave a comment:
-
i thought of another whilst i was watching the england v sri lanka tests. there seems to be a lot of left arm leg spinners coming on the scene, or it is becoming more pronounced, now i know that the game does include left arm wrist spinners in the regens but they are classes as LS and you dont really know until you play them, then they bowl normal SLA. Now that there seems to be more left arm leggies would it not be worth creating a new bowling category like there is SLA, OS and LS at the moment something like SLC or LAC for left arm chinaman as it used to be called
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jjamez View Postwith the arrival of kamindu mendis are we likely to see more probably regen players that are ambidextrous?
what about like the other sri lankan spinner who switches between leg spin and off spin. I know I've seen somewhere people asking about players being a bit like andrew symonds and bowl spin and seam. maybe input all three variations and you have to decide what they bowl, like literally press a button much like changing aggression of a batter
Also Oshane Thomas needs an upgrade and has to be RF, took the 2nd most wickets in the CPL.Last edited by adelaidecrowsrdabest; 11-08-2018, 09:41 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
with the arrival of kamindu mendis are we likely to see more probably regen players that are ambidextrous?
what about like the other sri lankan spinner who switches between leg spin and off spin. I know I've seen somewhere people asking about players being a bit like andrew symonds and bowl spin and seam. maybe input all three variations and you have to decide what they bowl, like literally press a button much like changing aggression of a batter
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bryce87 View PostIt is actually a perennial problem which has existed since the inception of the Cricket Captain series and the developers have never been able to fix it.
Young inexperienced real life players ALWAYS get overtaken in ability by fictional regenerated players. To be fair in this edition it has gotten a tiny bit better but the progress is still minute.
The problem is that the developers default rate the inexperienced real-life players too low, which prevents them from developing quickly and means they get overtaken by regens as immediately as the game commences. Just because 17 year Abhiskek Sharma (for example) has played two first class matches and averages low with the bat and high with the ball in these two matches this does not mean he should be given a terrible starting rating. In fact because he is 17 and playing first class cricket he should actually be given a very high rating which will allow him to stay in the game. At the moment he drops out of every game after 1-2 seasons because no team wants such a poorly rated player.
In fact any player who is even playing professional cricket should be given a good rating. There should be no batsmen averaging less than 40 2nd team or bowlers averaging less than 30 2nd team in the game, period!
Fans would much prefer seeing real life players develop than make believe regens.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bryce87 View PostFans would much prefer seeing real life players develop than make believe regens.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by adelaidecrowsrdabest View PostI'm not sure if it's a database issue but a lot of young Australian players never get picked by the state team AI guys like, Max Bryant, Will Sutherland, Cameron Green, Kuhnemann. Also Heazlett should be an opener.
Young inexperienced real life players ALWAYS get overtaken in ability by fictional regenerated players. To be fair in this edition it has gotten a tiny bit better but the progress is still minute.
The problem is that the developers default rate the inexperienced real-life players too low, which prevents them from developing quickly and means they get overtaken by regens as immediately as the game commences. Just because 17 year Abhiskek Sharma (for example) has played two first class matches and averages low with the bat and high with the ball in these two matches this does not mean he should be given a terrible starting rating. In fact because he is 17 and playing first class cricket he should actually be given a very high rating which will allow him to stay in the game. At the moment he drops out of every game after 1-2 seasons because no team wants such a poorly rated player.
In fact any player who is even playing professional cricket should be given a good rating. There should be no batsmen averaging less than 40 2nd team or bowlers averaging less than 30 2nd team in the game, period!
Fans would much prefer seeing real life players develop than make believe regens.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Jack Edwards needs a big batting upgrade, he needs to be an opener. He's just become the youngest to make a century in Australian one day cricket.
I'm not sure if it's a database issue but a lot of young Australian players never get picked by the state team AI guys like, Max Bryant, Will Sutherland, Cameron Green, Kuhnemann. Also Heazlett should be an opener.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi
Apologies if this is listed somewhere and this isn't quite the correct thread but does anybody know what year the games ends or will it just keep going forever?
I'm just playing England international mode and have reached 2032.
Many thanks
???????www.sillypointcricket.com
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by CardboardBox View PostI would just like to ask why Pakistan are so overrated? Not exactly a brilliant test side but are 5 stars and very difficult to play against. Mohammad Abbas should also probably be RFM not RMF. Some bloke called Zafar Gobar was also picked for their test team and he hasn't played many FC matches and doesn't look that good.
Players playing in South Africa and Pakistan seem to greatly outperform opponents from other countries who seem to have similar abilities. Case in point with Mohammed Abbas who in the game is twice the bowler of say Trent Boult whereas in real life that is highly debatable.
Personally I do not mind it as it makes the game very challenging especially in international mode with trying to beat the likes of Pakistan and South Africa. In my game in 2029 Pakistan have an ODI ranking of 42 which is absurd!
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vineetkr9016 View PostJust played 5 seasons with NSW and could not develope any of their young players up to international level, after 3 seasons random players(have checked mycricket website , they are not contracted to any club/stste in Aus) are getting selected by Australia. It would be better if their actual young players play for them , Database loses it's significance after 4/5 seasons.
Leave a comment:
-
Have noticed that a large chunk of pre-war batsmen in ATG mode seem to be rated exactly the same in batting ability, and a massive proportion of them seem to be 'very defensive' batsmen by default. Would be happy to go into more depth if necessary.
Leave a comment:
-
I would just like to ask why Pakistan are so overrated? Not exactly a brilliant test side but are 5 stars and very difficult to play against. Mohammad Abbas should also probably be RFM not RMF. Some bloke called Zafar Gobar was also picked for their test team and he hasn't played many FC matches and doesn't look that good.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: