I've been wondering how closely the two are linked.
In fielding training there's the option for Catching/Keeping. If I remember right, when a player listed as a wicket keeper succeeds at this you get the message that they have improved in keeping and for a regular player it says catching. I always assumed they worked with different abilities behind the scenes based on the player type to avoid accidentally choosing the wrong one.
However, in a match the default fielding list is ordered by catching ability as far as I know. I could be wrong here, but I've always felt the game puts your strongest catchers in the slips and so on. If I play multiple wicket keepers in a match, whichever isn't the actual keeper usually ends up right at the top of this fielder list as first slip. It makes sense as he's paid to catch the ball! But I have a 3rd keeper who always seems to drop catches when he keeps. It got to the point where I started a match with all 3 keepers as regular fielders and while my primary 2 were at the top of the slips as 1 and 2, the 3rd keeper was assigned near the bottom of the list, below regular batsmen and half the bowlers.
Does that imply that his weakness at catching the ball when he plays as a keeper is because his Catching rating is low, and that's the same rating used both behind the wicket and as a fielder? And when a player is on Catching/Keeping training it's working on the same ability/rating even though the success message is the same? Or does this wicket keeper simply have terrible ratings for both keeping and field catching, making him twice as bad?
On a similar note I have 1 batsman who is still placed at #1 on the fielding list when he plays even if I'm playing 2 keepers, with the non-keeping-keeper assigned as #2 on the list. Does that mean he'd actually make a better wicket keeper than my actual keepers, or is it simply his fielding catching rating that is better and he'd be worse with the gloves on?
Thanks in advance if anyone has insight into this. Something I'm curious about
In fielding training there's the option for Catching/Keeping. If I remember right, when a player listed as a wicket keeper succeeds at this you get the message that they have improved in keeping and for a regular player it says catching. I always assumed they worked with different abilities behind the scenes based on the player type to avoid accidentally choosing the wrong one.
However, in a match the default fielding list is ordered by catching ability as far as I know. I could be wrong here, but I've always felt the game puts your strongest catchers in the slips and so on. If I play multiple wicket keepers in a match, whichever isn't the actual keeper usually ends up right at the top of this fielder list as first slip. It makes sense as he's paid to catch the ball! But I have a 3rd keeper who always seems to drop catches when he keeps. It got to the point where I started a match with all 3 keepers as regular fielders and while my primary 2 were at the top of the slips as 1 and 2, the 3rd keeper was assigned near the bottom of the list, below regular batsmen and half the bowlers.
Does that imply that his weakness at catching the ball when he plays as a keeper is because his Catching rating is low, and that's the same rating used both behind the wicket and as a fielder? And when a player is on Catching/Keeping training it's working on the same ability/rating even though the success message is the same? Or does this wicket keeper simply have terrible ratings for both keeping and field catching, making him twice as bad?
On a similar note I have 1 batsman who is still placed at #1 on the fielding list when he plays even if I'm playing 2 keepers, with the non-keeping-keeper assigned as #2 on the list. Does that mean he'd actually make a better wicket keeper than my actual keepers, or is it simply his fielding catching rating that is better and he'd be worse with the gloves on?
Thanks in advance if anyone has insight into this. Something I'm curious about
Comment